Ruling on the enemy seizing Muslims’ private funds -A comparative jurisprudential study with public international law-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59759/jjis.v20i3.537Keywords:
international relations, spoils of war, international lawAbstract
This research aims to clarify the ruling on the property of Muslims that has been seized by enemies: Does ownership transfer to the enemies, or does it remain with the original Muslim owners? It also seeks to determine the ruling on this property if Muslims are victorious over the enemies and reclaim it: Does it return to its original owners, or does it remain a right of the conquerors?
The researcher concluded that the Islamic property seized by the enemies does not transfer ownership to them but remains the property of the original Muslim owners. Furthermore, if the Muslims reclaim this property from the enemies, it returns to its original owners.
The researcher recommended the necessity of continuing research on issues of international relations and revisiting the rulings made by jurists on these matters in light of today's global changes.