Explanatory Statement Directive (Rooting and Application)

Abstract

The research addresses one of the systematic approaches in enhancing the consideration of judgments taken up in the interpretation, and that through studying the interpretive opinions in a way to allow the beholder of such opinions to compile, direct and account for the common grounds between them, so, the interpretive opinions are scientific judgments based on procedures, controls and components, which are the results of those procedures and yields, and such yields would come in multiple forms, colors and agree on their intended ends; however, the interpretive opinion has a number of systematic controls, and rules that help to understand it, and it is divided into a set of kinds, namely: acceptable guidance, possible guidance, impossible guidance, the kinds over which work revolves in directing the interpretive opinions, and, there is no interpretive opinion but falls under any of such kinds, whereupon, the researcher found systematic benefits that would reinstate the reading of interpretive opinions in light of guidance science, in order to demonstrate the interpretive multiplicity of Quran text, and to possibly combine between them and direct them to one purpose, in order to achieve a clear method that would bring the opinions closer together and not to keep them apart.